digital photography, learn photography, photo tips

ISO Killed the Professional Photographer

Perhaps the title is a bit much, or is it?

Emily 054

Emily 054

Consider that the some of the first barriers to becoming a professional photographer were prices in camera bodies, lenses, and lighting equipment. Nowadays the entry level “Pro-sumer” DSLRs allow many people without a professional photographer’s budget to break into the field of professional photography. Lenses are still expensive, but the overall quality of even the lower level lenses allow for many “weekend warriors” to produce images that are crisp enough to the untrained eye.

The last barrier was in lighting equipment. Sure, you can still easily break the bank with a great setup but there are some really fantastic lighting kits to be had at nominal pricing.

Then along comes these really fantastic DSLRs of late. The Canon EOS 5D Mark II and the Nikon D700 both of which boast an ISO setting of up to 25,600! Many cameras in our near future will follow suit from these camera manufacturers as well as their respective competitors.

Mobola 087

Mobola 087

It is a wonderful time to be a photographer indeed.

The real implication of these super fast and seemingly ground breaking cameras is that those ISOs allow for great images in low light situations. This is where professional photographers the world over will have to step up their game. One of the most widely ignored true techniques in a pro photographer’s repertoire was the ability to capture great images while manipulating or controlling the way a camera captures light. This is true whether that pro used expensive light kits or not.

Powerful light kits were required because the ISOs of film needed so much more light than is required now. Only a fraction of light is needed at an ISO of 1600 than what was needed at 100! Now we can use variable powered off camera or camera mounted strobes to project enough light to rival the work done by yesteryear’s professional photographers.

Now before you start sending all of your emails I do want to add that the learning curve of creating captivating and moving photographs is still there. Yes, you do still need to know about composition, style, color, etc.

But isn’t it interesting that the Strobist group on Flickr (or our Flickr group as well) has images posted daily that are far better than some of the “pro photographers” in my area? Have you looked at some of the websites of some of the pros in your area? What do you think?

Photographs Emily 054 and Mobola 087 both by RKD Photography which were done with SB 800s. You can learn more about RKD and his photographic process at his blog A Photographer’s Journey.


Popularity: 21% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Are YOU Good Enough To Be A Professional Photographer?
  2. Readers Questions In A Flash
  3. Small Strobes for Ad Campaigns
  4. Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO
  5. The Photographer’s Bill of Rights

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Tags:

About the Author: Damien Franco is a contemporary art photographer living in the deserts of West Texas. He likes long walks on the beach and thinks art is groovy.

  • Rob
    I think it is a curve just like a lot of things. I built web sites way back in the days of dial up, hand coding HTML. When the WYSIWYG tools and sites like GeoCities started to catch on everyone proclaimed the death of the webmaster. Sure, you could make a site without writing code that looked great, but once you get past templates, you need coders.

    Good, inexpensive DSLRs have killed off the "rip off" guys who used to get away with charging $500 for a set of 8 x 10s. School pictures are going to be the next to go. Parents just dont need to buy them anymore. True pros have no worries. The hacks who over charged for "studio" shots are the ones on the run.
  • I thought film killed the professional photographer. In the late 1800s George Eastman claimed it made photography "... so easy even a school boy or girl can get professional results." :)
  • N!
    I completely disagree most of the ideas presented here. A pro is a pro. End of story. And having used prosumer super zooms, and the newer mega-pix dslrs. Under ideal conditions I can create a nice image with any camera, but I've been shooting for years.

    I can see the difference between shots from a Nikon, Canon, and Hasselblad. I can also tell with my Canon, generally, what ISO I shot when I look at the photo. A pro is a pro. And a good eye is a good eye. They're not the same thing.

    To shift the perspective, consider this. How many guitars are there in this world? There are lots, and lots of people who can riff, but that doesn't make them "professional". And that doesn't even touch the difference between playing a song, and writing one.

    The quality level of amateur work has risen because their options have improved. But for real, if the "pros" are worried that a weekend warrior with a Rebel, and and a plastic zoom are going to take them out of business, then seriously, wtf?
  • As a dedicated Strobist reader (flickr and blog) and relatively new professional, I am very impressed by the Strobist pool. Many, many readers there who are not professional photographers could be if they had the desire and business sense. As for ISOs enabling the hobbiest, it's true, but it aids the long-time professional just as much IF they are willing to continue learning and adapting.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.